Get Da 2166 9 1 Form in PDF

Misconceptions about the DA 2166-9-1 form can lead to confusion regarding its purpose and usage. Below are four common misconceptions, along with clarifications.

• The DA 2166-9-1 form is only for negative evaluations. This form is used for both positive and negative evaluations of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). It provides a comprehensive assessment of performance, including strengths and areas for improvement.
• Only the rater's signature is required for the evaluation to be valid. In addition to the rater's signature, the senior rater's signature is also necessary. This dual-signature requirement ensures that the evaluation is reviewed and validated at multiple levels.
• The form is only relevant during annual evaluations. The DA 2166-9-1 can be used for various evaluation periods, including initial evaluations and those triggered by changes in duty assignments. Its flexibility allows for timely assessments throughout an NCO's career.
• Completing the form is solely the responsibility of the rater. While the rater plays a significant role in filling out the form, the rated NCO also has responsibilities. The rated NCO must verify that the administrative data is correct and acknowledge their understanding of the evaluation process.

1. Incomplete Information: Many individuals fail to fill out all required fields. Ensure that every section, especially personal data like name and SSN, is complete.

2. Incorrect Dates: Entering the wrong dates for the period covered can lead to significant issues. Double-check all date entries for accuracy.

3. Missing Signatures: Some users forget to obtain necessary signatures from raters and senior raters. All required signatures must be included before submission.

4. Improper Email Addresses: Using incorrect or personal email addresses instead of .gov or .mil can delay communication. Always use official email formats.

5. Inaccurate Duty Descriptions: Providing vague or incomplete descriptions of duties can affect the evaluation's effectiveness. Be specific and thorough in detailing responsibilities.

6. Neglecting Comments: Failing to provide comments where required, especially in performance evaluations, can weaken the report. Use this space to clearly articulate observations and assessments.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to follow specific guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Here is a list of things to do and avoid:

• Do double-check all personal information, including name and SSN, for accuracy.
• Do ensure that all required signatures are obtained before submission.
• Do clearly indicate the period covered by the evaluation.
• Do provide detailed descriptions of duties and responsibilities in the appropriate sections.
• Don't leave any sections blank; all fields must be completed or marked as not applicable.
• Don't use informal language or abbreviations that may confuse the reader.
• Don't forget to review the completed form for any errors before submission.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential tool for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. A similar document is the DA Form 2166-9, which serves as the overall evaluation report for NCOs. While the 2166-9-1 focuses specifically on the evaluation of Sergeants, the 2166-9 provides a broader evaluation for all NCO ranks. Both forms emphasize the importance of providing feedback on leadership qualities, professional development, and overall performance, ensuring that NCOs receive consistent assessments throughout their careers.

Another comparable document is the DA Form 1059, which is used for the Academic Evaluation Report. This form evaluates soldiers who have completed training courses or educational programs. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, the 1059 assesses the individual's performance, potential, and accomplishments. Both forms aim to document a soldier's growth and readiness for future responsibilities, highlighting the importance of continuous learning and development in the military.

The DA Form 4856 is also relevant as it serves as a Developmental Counseling Form. This document is used by leaders to provide feedback and guidance to soldiers on their performance and behavior. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, the 4856 encourages open communication between leaders and soldiers, fostering a culture of accountability and improvement. Both forms play a critical role in ensuring that soldiers understand their strengths and areas for development.

Next, the DA Form 700, known as the Personnel Qualification Record, provides a comprehensive overview of a soldier's qualifications, assignments, and training. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on performance evaluation, the 700 serves as a summary of a soldier's entire career, including education and certifications. Both documents are vital for tracking a soldier's progress and ensuring they meet the necessary standards for advancement.

The DA Form 2-1, or the Personnel Qualification Record, is another document that shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. It captures a soldier's career history, including assignments, training, and awards. While the 2166-9-1 evaluates current performance, the 2-1 provides a historical perspective, allowing leaders to assess a soldier's overall trajectory. Together, these forms help leaders make informed decisions about promotions and assignments.

Understanding the significance of a Power of Attorney for a Child document can help fulfill a parent's duty to safeguard their child's best interests in various circumstances. This legal tool empowers designated adults to assume essential responsibilities when parents are unavailable, ensuring that crucial decisions are made without delay.

The DA Form 3349, which is the Physical Profile, is relevant as it documents a soldier's physical capabilities and limitations. This form is essential for understanding how a soldier's physical condition may impact their performance, much like the DA Form 2166-9-1 evaluates an NCO's overall effectiveness. Both documents emphasize the importance of maintaining physical readiness and the role it plays in a soldier's ability to lead and perform duties.

Another document to consider is the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report. While this form is specific to officers, it shares the same purpose of evaluating performance and potential. Both the DA Form 67-9 and the DA Form 2166-9-1 assess leadership qualities, contributions to the unit, and readiness for future roles. They provide a structured way to document evaluations and ensure that feedback is standardized across ranks.

The DA Form 600-8-101, known as the Army Personnel Action, is a document that tracks personnel actions such as promotions and reassignments. While it does not evaluate performance directly, it is closely related to the evaluation process. The DA Form 2166-9-1 informs personnel actions by providing a basis for decisions regarding promotions and career advancement, highlighting the interconnectedness of evaluation and personnel management.

Lastly, the DA Form 2404, which is the Equipment Inspection and Maintenance Worksheet, is similar in that it documents the condition and performance of military equipment. While it focuses on equipment rather than personnel, both forms emphasize the importance of accountability and performance standards. They ensure that both soldiers and equipment are maintained to the highest standards, contributing to overall mission success.